111 research outputs found

    Comparability in the graph monoid

    Full text link
    Let Ξ“\Gamma be the infinite cyclic group on a generator x.x. To avoid confusion when working with Z\mathbb Z-modules which also have an additional Z\mathbb Z-action, we consider the Z\mathbb Z-action to be a Ξ“\Gamma-action instead. Starting from a directed graph EE, one can define a cancellative commutative monoid MEΞ“M_E^\Gamma with a Ξ“\Gamma-action which agrees with the monoid structure and a natural order. The order and the action enable one to label each nonzero element as being exactly one of the following: comparable (periodic or aperiodic) or incomparable. We comprehensively pair up these element features with the graph-theoretic properties of the generators of the element. We also characterize graphs such that every element of MEΞ“M_E^\Gamma is comparable, periodic, graphs such that every nonzero element of MEΞ“M_E^\Gamma is aperiodic, incomparable, graphs such that no nonzero element of MEΞ“M_E^\Gamma is periodic, and graphs such that no element of MEΞ“M_E^\Gamma is aperiodic. The Graded Classification Conjecture can be formulated to state that MEΞ“M_E^\Gamma is a complete invariant of the Leavitt path algebra LK(E)L_K(E) of EE over a field K.K. Our characterizations indicate that the Graded Classification Conjecture may have a positive answer since the properties of EE are well reflected by the structure of MEΞ“.M_E^\Gamma. Our work also implies that some results of [R. Hazrat, H. Li, The talented monoid of a Leavitt path algebra, J. Algebra, 547 (2020) 430-455] hold without requiring the graph to be row-finite.Comment: This version contains some modifications based on the input of a referee for the New York Journal of Mathematic

    Baer and Baer *-ring characterizations of Leavitt path algebras

    Full text link
    We characterize Leavitt path algebras which are Rickart, Baer, and Baer βˆ—*-rings in terms of the properties of the underlying graph. In order to treat non-unital Leavitt path algebras as well, we generalize these annihilator-related properties to locally unital rings and provide a more general characterizations of Leavitt path algebras which are locally Rickart, locally Baer, and locally Baer βˆ—*-rings. Leavitt path algebras are also graded rings and we formulate the graded versions of these annihilator-related properties and characterize Leavitt path algebras having those properties as well. Our characterizations provide a quick way to generate a wide variety of examples of rings. For example, creating a Baer and not a Baer βˆ—*-ring, a Rickart βˆ—*-ring which is not Baer, or a Baer and not a Rickart βˆ—*-ring, is straightforward using the graph-theoretic properties from our results. In addition, our characterizations showcase more properties which distinguish behavior of Leavitt path algebras from their Cβˆ—C^*-algebra counterparts. For example, while a graph Cβˆ—C^*-algebra is Baer (and a Baer βˆ—*-ring) if and only if the underlying graph is finite and acyclic, a Leavitt path algebra is Baer if and only if the graph is finite and no cycle has an exit, and it is a Baer βˆ—*-ring if and only if the graph is a finite disjoint union of graphs which are finite and acyclic or loops.Comment: Some typos present in the first version are now correcte

    K-theory Classification of Graded Ultramatricial Algebras with Involution

    Full text link
    We consider a generalization K0gr⁑(R)K_0^{\operatorname{gr}}(R) of the standard Grothendieck group K0(R)K_0(R) of a graded ring RR with involution. If Ξ“\Gamma is an abelian group, we show that K0gr⁑K_0^{\operatorname{gr}} completely classifies graded ultramatricial βˆ—*-algebras over a Ξ“\Gamma-graded βˆ—*-field AA such that (1) each nontrivial graded component of AA has a unitary element in which case we say that AA has enough unitaries, and (2) the zero-component A0A_0 is 2-proper (for any a,b∈A0,a,b\in A_0, aaβˆ—+bbβˆ—=0aa^*+bb^*=0 implies a=b=0a=b=0) and βˆ—*-pythagorean (for any a,b∈A0,a,b\in A_0, aaβˆ—+bbβˆ—=ccβˆ—aa^*+bb^*=cc^* for some c∈A0c\in A_0). If the involutive structure is not considered, our result implies that K0gr⁑K_0^{\operatorname{gr}} completely classifies graded ultramatricial algebras over any graded field A.A. If the grading is trivial and the involutive structure is not considered, we obtain some well known results as corollaries. If RR and SS are graded matricial βˆ—*-algebras over a Ξ“\Gamma-graded βˆ—*-field AA with enough unitaries and f:K0gr⁑(R)β†’K0gr⁑(S)f: K_0^{\operatorname{gr}}(R)\to K_0^{\operatorname{gr}}(S) is a contractive Z[Ξ“]\mathbb Z[\Gamma]-module homomorphism, we present a specific formula for a graded βˆ—*-homomorphism Ο•:Rβ†’S\phi: R\to S with K0gr⁑(Ο•)=f.K_0^{\operatorname{gr}}(\phi) = f. If the grading is trivial and the involutive structure is not considered, our constructive proof implies the known results with existential proofs. As an application of our results, we show that the graded version of the Isomorphism Conjecture holds for a class of Leavitt path algebras: if EE and FF are countable, row-finite, no-exit graphs in which every path ends in a sink or a cycle and KK is a 2-proper and βˆ—*-pythagorean field, then the Leavitt path algebras LK(E)L_K(E) and LK(F)L_K(F) are isomorphic as graded rings if any only if they are isomorphic as graded βˆ—*-algebras.Comment: Some typos present in the second version are now correcte

    Graded Rings and Graded Grothendieck Groups

    Full text link
    This monograph is devoted to a comprehensive study of graded rings and graded K-theory. A bird's eye view of the graded module theory over a graded ring gives an impression of the module theory with the added adjective "graded" to all its statements. Once the grading is considered to be trivial, the graded theory reduces to the usual module theory. So from this perspective, the graded module theory can be considered as an extension of the module theory. However, one aspect that could be easily missed from such a panoramic view is that, the graded module theory comes equipped with a shifting, thanks to being able to partition the structures and rearranging these partitions. This adds an extra layer of structure (and complexity) to the theory. An sparkling example of this is the theory of graded Grothendieck groups, K^{gr}_0, which is the main focus of this monograph. Whereas the usual K_0 is an abelian group, thanks to the shiftings, K^{gr}_0 has a natural Z[\Gamma]-module structure, where \Gamma is the graded group. As we will see throughout this note, this extra structure carries a substantial information about the graded ring.Comment: 240 pages; To appear in London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes Series, Cambridge University Pres
    • …
    corecore